The Process

From contract upload to risk flag in under 10 minutes.

Clauseharbor doesn't require setup, training data, or a professional services engagement. Connect your repository, and the analysis begins.

4-Step Process

From upload to report

1
Connect your repository

Drag and drop contract files or connect M365, Google Drive, iManage, or NetDocuments. Clauseharbor ingests your full contract library — not just today's agreement.

2
Clause extraction and classification

The model identifies clause boundaries, classifies each clause into one of 12 risk categories, and scores the clause based on its specific terms — not just its presence. A 90-day auto-renewal notice period scores differently from a 30-day period. A 3-month liability cap scores differently from a 12-month cap. A 200-page agreement is processed in under 90 seconds.

3
Risk dashboard surfaces flags

High-priority risk flags surface to the top. Filter by clause type, risk tier, counterparty, or renewal date. Drill down to the specific clause text in one click.

4
Export for counsel review

Generate redline-ready clause summaries with risk annotations. Share with outside counsel without exporting raw contract data. PDF and CSV export formats.

What Clauseharbor Reads

How we extract and score clause risk

Clauseharbor reads at the clause level — not the document level. Each clause is extracted, classified by intent and structure, and scored against our risk taxonomy before a risk flag is generated.

CONTRACT DOCUMENT Clause Detection CLAUSE EXTRACTION AUTO-RENEWAL ...renews for 12-month terms unless 90-day... notice provided... CHANGE OF CONTROL ...assignment upon change of control requires written... LIABILITY CAP ...shall not exceed 3-month fees... + 9 more clause categories Category Classification RISK SCORING AUTO-RENEWAL MEDIUM 90-day notice period No cap escalation CHANGE OF CONTROL HIGH Consent required No cure period Flag Generation RISK FLAGS HIGH — Change of Control HIGH — Exclusivity MED — Auto-Renewal MED — Liability Cap INFO — Governing Law
Performance

Accurate on the clause types that matter most — transparent where it isn't

We do not claim Clauseharbor is a substitute for attorney review. The model is calibrated for standard commercial agreements in English — MSAs, SOWs, NDAs, vendor contracts. For highly negotiated agreements, complex multi-party structures, or non-English language contracts, accuracy drops and we say so in the product. The figures below reflect performance on the agreement types in-house counsel encounter most often.

94%

clause identification accuracy on standard commercial agreements — the clause types in-house counsel most commonly need to surface

<90s

to process a 200-page agreement. A 500-contract library is typically complete in under 15 minutes.

Figures reflect performance on standard commercial agreements in English. Complex, highly negotiated, or multi-language contracts may vary. We recommend human review of all flagged clauses before taking action.

Ready to see it on your contracts?

Request access and run Clauseharbor on your own contract library. See exactly what it finds — before committing.